The 8 Forms of Capital help Kokonut see value without pretending every kind of value is the same.

A regenerative farm can create, protect, use, or degrade many kinds of value at the same time. Some of that value is financial. Some is ecological. Some exists in:

relationships;
skills;
infrastructure;
knowledge;
culture;
health and safety.

Kokonut uses the 8 Forms of Capital to organize those different value domains:

Natural Capital
Financial Capital
Social Capital
Human Capital
Material Capital
Intellectual Capital
Cultural Capital
Health Capital

The purpose is not to convert them into one universal number.

The 8 Forms classify value. Evidence describes what happened inside each category.

Start with the Pillars of Value

Use WHAT, WHO, HOW MUCH, CONTRIBUTION, RISK, and PUBLIC GOODS to structure the questions before categorizing the value.

Connect value to evidence

Match every material capital claim to the appropriate source, measurement, reporting period, review, and limitations.

Interpret positive impact carefully

Move from alignment and activity to measured outcomes before making stronger impact interpretations.

See Adelphi as a reference

Inspect which forms are represented by documented assets, activities, forecasts, and still-developing outcome evidence.

The eight forms are not interchangeable units. One hectare of habitat, one dollar of revenue, one training session, one community relationship, and one health outcome cannot be added together into a scientifically meaningful “total capital” score without a separately defined methodology.

The eight forms in one view

Form	What it helps organize	Example evidence	Common overclaim to avoid
Natural	Land, soil, water, vegetation, biodiversity, ecological condition	Soil/field records, vegetation indicators, species/survival records	“A regenerative practice means nature improved”
Financial	Budgets, revenue, costs, treasury, liquidity, allocations	Forecasts, sales, expenses, treasury/accounting records	“Projected revenue is realized value”
Social	Relationships, participation, coordination, trust, networks	Participation, partnership, contribution, feedback records	“Attendance means stronger social cohesion”
Human	Skills, knowledge, leadership, capability, safety competence	Training, assessment, role, mentorship records	“Training delivered means capability increased”
Material	Physical assets and operating infrastructure	Asset, build, maintenance, utilization records	“Infrastructure exists, therefore it creates value”
Intellectual	Data, methods, documentation, research, software, reusable learning	Git history, datasets, schemas, reports, reuse records	“Published information is automatically useful or correct”
Cultural	Stories, identity, land memory, traditions, heritage knowledge	Oral histories, documentation, participation, species/crop records	“A story or heritage label proves cultural benefit”
Health	Worker safety, food access, wellbeing-related conditions	Safety, incident, food production/distribution, appropriate health evidence	“Regenerative food automatically produces medical outcomes”

A single activity can affect several forms at once. That does not mean the same activity should be counted repeatedly as eight separate impacts.

What the 8 Forms do — and what they do not

They can help	They cannot do automatically
Make non-financial value visible in planning	Prove that value was actually created
Organize different kinds of evidence	Convert unlike outcomes into one valid unit
Reveal trade-offs across domains	Decide which trade-off is ethically correct
Improve proposal and report structure	Determine whether funding should be approved
Support multi-period learning	Guarantee comparability across farms
Expose value that budgets miss	Replace financial analysis
Show where public value may exist	Prove a public good was delivered
Give software a consistent classification vocabulary	Allow AI to autonomously certify impact

The forms are most useful when they make a decision harder to oversimplify.

Where the 8 Forms sit in the Framework

Framework element	Role
Common Data Schema	Establishes compatible baseline context
Pillars of Value	Structures the questions
8 Forms of Capital	Categorizes the value being discussed
5 Principles of Regeneration	Describes regenerative design/practice
MRV	Connects claims to observations, measurements, review, and publication
Positive Impact Methodology	Defines when evidence can support stronger interpretations
SDGs / EBF / CRISP	Add development, ecological-benefit, and risk lenses
Kokonut Intelligence	Implements data lifecycle, analytics, reporting, and attestation infrastructure

Pillars = inquiry structure. 8 Forms = value categories. MRV = evidence. Interpretation comes later.

Capital is a useful metaphor — not permission to financialize everything

The word capital is useful because it highlights that farms depend on assets and capacities beyond cash. But Kokonut should not imply that every form:

has a market price;
should be tokenized;
should be privately owned;
can be traded;
can be substituted for another;
should be optimized only for financial return.

For example:

natural value can be damaged even while financial revenue rises;
cultural value may be important even when it has no market price;
worker health should not be treated as a tradable offset against higher production;
open knowledge can create public value without being monetized;
stronger infrastructure can increase dependency if maintenance capacity is missing.

The Framework should make those tensions visible rather than compressing them into one score.

The eight forms

1. Natural Capital

What it organizes

Natural Capital covers the ecological systems and conditions on which the farm depends. Examples include:

soil;
water;
vegetation;
habitat;
species;
biodiversity;
biomass;
ecological condition;
land-cover patterns.

Useful planning questions

What ecological assets or conditions matter to this farm?
What is the baseline?
What practices are intended to protect or improve them?
What could degrade them?
Which indicators are direct measurements versus derived proxies?
Over what period would change reasonably be observable?

Evidence can include

Evidence class	Examples
Baseline	Soil observations, mapped land, species inventory, vegetation condition
Activity	Biochar application, cover establishment, planting, nursery propagation
Measurement	Soil moisture/EC/temperature, survival, ground cover, defined biodiversity observations
Derived indicator	NDVI, NDRE, ReCI, MSAVI
Interpretation	Bounded soil, vegetation, habitat, or biodiversity conclusion

Important boundary

A farm can implement:

syntropic plots;
biochar;
cover vegetation;
native-species propagation;

without yet proving that:

soil health improved;
biodiversity was restored;
carbon increased;
resilience improved.

Those are stronger claims.

Adelphi reference

Current repository materials document:

two syntropic plots;
bamboo-derived biochar practices;
vegetative cover / beard grass;
nursery and agroforestry activity;
12+ native or at-risk species identified in repository materials;
remote-sensing and ground-observation capability.

These establish natural-capital-relevant assets and activities. Longitudinal ecological outcomes remain evidence-dependent.

2. Financial Capital

What it organizes

Financial Capital covers monetary resources and financial operating capacity. Examples include:

budgets;
grants;
treasury funding;
sales;
revenue;
expenses;
liquidity;
maintenance funding;
public-goods allocations;
reserves where applicable.

Separate financial states

State	Example
Forecast	Expected crop revenue
Approved	Budget/proposal authorized
Received	Funds actually received
Spent	Actual expenditure
Earned	Realized sales/revenue
Allocated	Amount designated for a purpose
Transferred	Money actually moved
Used	Funds actually spent by/for the intended beneficiary or activity

These are not interchangeable.

Evidence can include

budget;
approved proposal;
bank/treasury/accounting records;
invoices;
harvest/sales records;
realized prices;
expense records;
variance analysis;
public-goods transfer/use records.

Adelphi reference

Adelphi has documented funding history and a crop-production financial forecast. The current crop model projects roughly $149,110.87/year in gross crop revenue at modeled steady-state performance. The current farm model also uses a 10% public-goods allocation assumption. Both are forecasts/model assumptions until realized records exist.

The repository also contains a conflicting historical 40/40/20 allocation model. Do not treat either percentage as a universal Framework rule or as a realized distribution without authoritative farm-specific records.

Financial Capital does not replace profitability, liquidity, cash-flow, budget, or risk analysis.

What it organizes

Social Capital covers relationships and coordination capacity among people and organizations. Examples include:

local relationships;
trust;
participation;
partnerships;
contributor networks;
cooperation;
governance participation;
coordination pathways.

Evidence can include

event participation;
recurring participation;
partnership records;
contribution records;
meeting / coordination records;
stakeholder feedback;
retention;
conflict / grievance records where appropriate;
repeated collaboration.

A workshop with 40 attendees proves attendance. It does not automatically prove:

increased trust;
stronger community cohesion;
durable collaboration;
reduced conflict;
improved local agency.

Those require additional evidence.

Adelphi reference

Adelphi connects:

local founders/operators;
workers;
nearby community participation;
training/community infrastructure;
Kokonut contributors;
funding/coordination partners.

The safe claim is that coordination relationships and participation pathways exist. Their depth, durability, distribution, and effect should be evaluated separately.

4. Human Capital

What it organizes

Human Capital covers people’s capabilities. Examples include:

skills;
practical knowledge;
leadership;
operational competence;
agronomic knowledge;
data/MRV capability;
safety competence;
mentoring.

Activity is not capability

Claim level	Example
Activity	A training session occurred
Participation	A person attended
Learning evidence	Knowledge/skill assessment changed
Applied capability	Participant later performs the task competently
Durable capacity	Capability persists and can be transferred/mentored

Evidence can include

curriculum;
attendance;
pre/post assessment;
competency demonstration;
role progression;
mentorship;
repeat performance;
safety training;
operator review.

Adelphi reference

Adelphi documents a training/community gazebo and farm activities that can support learning around:

agroecology;
syntropic systems;
nursery work;
biological inputs;
poultry;
farm operations;
evidence/data collection.

That establishes training capacity and activity. It does not by itself prove long-term skill gain or livelihood improvement.

5. Material Capital

What it organizes

Material Capital covers the physical systems required to operate. Examples include:

farm infrastructure;
water systems;
tools;
buildings;
nursery facilities;
poultry infrastructure;
roads/access;
storage;
monitoring equipment;
energy systems.

Existence is not performance

Infrastructure can be:

planned;
under construction;
completed;
operational;
partially operational;
underused;
degraded;
awaiting maintenance.

Those states matter.

Evidence can include

Evidence	Question
Build / procurement record	Was the asset created or acquired?
Acceptance record	Was it delivered to specification?
Operating record	Is it actually being used?
Utilization	How much / how often is it used?
Maintenance	Is it being kept functional?
Failure / downtime	Where is capacity being lost?
Output linkage	What production or service depends on it?

Adelphi reference

Current documentation includes:

production beds;
syntropic plots;
nursery;
biofactory;
poultry infrastructure;
training/community gazebo;
irrigation/water infrastructure;
mapped farm zones and related operating infrastructure.

These are documented physical assets/capabilities. Their value should be evaluated through condition, use, maintenance, and output, not only construction.

6. Intellectual Capital

What it organizes

Intellectual Capital covers reusable information and knowledge artifacts. Examples include:

farm data;
documentation;
schemas;
methodologies;
research;
reports;
code;
APIs;
open-source tools;
lessons learned;
agent workflows.

Publication is not the same as reuse

Evidence can progress through:

Stage	Example
Created	A dataset, page, method, or code artifact exists
Reviewed	The artifact passed an appropriate review
Published	Others can access it
Used	Another workflow or person consumes it
Reused	Another farm/project adopts or adapts it
Improved	Feedback changes the shared method/tool

Adelphi reference

Adelphi contributes to Intellectual Capital because it generates a live reference context for:

Framework methods;
farm records;
forecasts;
MRV practices;
infrastructure documentation;
farm-data workflows;
lessons that can inform later farms.

That does not mean every Adelphi-specific choice is automatically reusable elsewhere.

Replication value comes from learning which parts transfer and which parts require local adaptation.

7. Cultural Capital

What it organizes

Cultural Capital covers meaning, identity, memory, tradition, and place-based knowledge. Examples include:

founder/community stories;
relationship to land;
local agricultural knowledge;
heritage practices;
cultural uses of species/crops;
intergenerational knowledge;
identity connected to place.

Cultural value should not be invented from outside

A farm team or documentation contributor should not label something:

culturally important;
traditional;
heritage;
sacred;
community-owned;

without appropriate local grounding.

Evidence can include

first-person histories;
interviews;
local documentation;
community participation;
archival records where appropriate;
species/crop history;
repeated cultural programming;
consented storytelling.

Adelphi reference

Adelphi’s documented background includes Yanny and Neury Hernández and their relationship to family land and local place. That supports a documented place/founder story. Stronger claims about community-wide cultural preservation should require broader local evidence rather than being inferred from the founders’ story alone. Read the Adelphi background story →

8. Health Capital

What it organizes

Health Capital covers health- and safety-related conditions connected to farm work and farm outputs. Examples include:

worker safety;
occupational conditions;
safe water/handling where relevant;
food availability/access;
food-production records;
wellbeing-related program evidence;
documented health outcomes when an appropriate methodology exists.

Separate food production from health outcome

Claim	Evidence needed
Food was produced	Harvest/production record
Food was sold/distributed locally	Sales/distribution record
Access improved	Population, affordability/access, distribution, reporting period
Nutrition improved	Appropriate nutrition evidence/methodology
Medical outcome improved	Appropriate clinical/public-health evidence

Adelphi reference

Adelphi documents production systems for:

vegetables;
fruit;
coconut;
eggs.

It also has worker/farm operating contexts where safety evidence matters. The safe claims concern:

food production;
distribution/sales when recorded;
safety practices when documented.

Do not infer superior nutrition, disease reduction, or medical benefit from the regenerative label.

Forms can overlap without being double-counted

One intervention can create several plausible value pathways. Example: a nursery. That does not mean:

“one nursery = six impacts”

Each claim needs its own:

boundary;
stakeholder;
metric or qualitative evidence;
reporting period;
source;
limitations.

Multi-capital is not multi-counting. Tag one activity to several relevant forms when useful, but evaluate each claimed outcome independently.

Trade-offs matter

The eight forms are useful partly because they expose situations where one form improves while another may weaken.

Example	Possible gain	Possible cost / risk
Expand production area	Financial / Material	Natural if habitat or soil is degraded
Buy more machinery	Material / Financial efficiency	Financial cost, soil disturbance, dependency
Publish precise farm data	Intellectual / Social transparency	Privacy, cultural, security, or governance risk
Add livestock	Financial / Natural nutrient-loop potential	Health, welfare, water, feed, soil risks
Maximize short-cycle crops	Financial near-term	Natural/perennial continuity if system becomes simplified
Volunteer-heavy model	Social participation	Human/Financial risk if labor is uncompensated or unsustainable

The Framework should not hide those tensions. The Pillars of Value — especially WHO, CONTRIBUTION, and RISK — help examine them.

Measurement should match the form

Not every form should be measured with money. Not every form should even be reduced to a single numeric indicator.

Form	Quantitative examples	Qualitative / contextual examples
Natural	survival %, ground cover %, soil readings	field condition, habitat observations
Financial	revenue, expense, cash, variance	funding restrictions, liquidity context
Social	participation/retention counts	trust, relationship quality, stakeholder feedback
Human	completion/assessment results	demonstrated competence, mentoring quality
Material	asset count, uptime, utilization	condition, suitability, maintenance context
Intellectual	publications, API usage, reuse count	method quality, applicability, lessons
Cultural	participation, documented artifacts	meaning, narrative, local significance
Health	incidents, safety training, access counts	wellbeing/safety context; clinical claims require proper methods

Choose the metric because it fits the claim — not because it makes a dashboard easier to score.

Evidence maturity applies to every form

The Positive Impact Methodology’s claim ladder still applies.

Maturity	Capital example
Alignment	The proposal says a training program will build Human Capital
Activity	Training occurred
Measured outcome	Skill/competency evidence changed
Impact interpretation	Evidence supports a bounded conclusion about capability over the reporting period

Another example:

Maturity	Natural Capital
Alignment	Farm design includes biodiversity objectives
Activity	Nursery/agroforestry planting occurred
Measured outcome	Survival or another biodiversity indicator was measured
Impact interpretation	Evidence supports a bounded ecological conclusion

The label “Natural Capital” does not make the last step automatic.

How value becomes evidence

The old version of this page used one mandatory technical path:

activity → MRV payload → IPFS/Filecoin → Farm Registry → EAS → Hub/report

That is no longer the Framework standard. Different claims need different evidence paths. The durable sequence is:

claim → source record → measurement/observation → review → publish when appropriate → attest when useful → interpret

EAS, IPFS, Filecoin, or another durable-public infrastructure layer can be useful. They are not required for every capital record. And they do not make the underlying claim scientifically true.

A reusable capital-claim record

For any material claim, capture:

Field	Question
Primary capital form	Which of the eight forms is the main category?
Secondary forms	Which other forms are relevant without double-counting?
Claim	What exactly is asserted?
Claim level	Alignment, activity, measured outcome, or impact interpretation?
WHO / boundary	Who or what is affected?
Baseline	What was the starting condition?
Metric / evidence	What will be measured, counted, observed, or documented?
Method	How?
Reporting period	When?
Actual vs. forecast	Is the value observed or modeled?
Source	Which record/dataset?
Reviewer	Who reviews it?
Risk / trade-off	Which other capital forms could weaken?
Evidence status	Draft, submitted, reviewed/verified, published?
Next evidence	What would strengthen or falsify the claim?

This keeps a capital classification connected to a real evidence requirement.

Adelphi: eight forms with evidence boundaries

Adelphi can illustrate all eight forms without claiming that all eight have already improved.

Form	Current documented basis	Safe current interpretation	Stronger evidence still needed
Natural	Syntropic plots, cover practices, biochar, nursery/agroforestry, species records	Ecological practices/assets are present	Longitudinal soil/biodiversity/water outcomes
Financial	Funding history + crop/revenue forecast + public-goods model	Financial planning/coordination exists	Realized revenue, costs, cash flow, transfers
Social	Local operators, workers, community/training infrastructure, contributor/partner relationships	Coordination and participation pathways exist	Durable trust, distribution, community outcomes
Human	Training/community space and operating knowledge activities	Training capacity/activity exists	Skill gain, applied competence, long-term capability
Material	Beds, poultry, nursery, biofactory, gazebo, irrigation/water and farm infrastructure	Physical operating capacity exists	Utilization, condition, maintenance, output linkage
Intellectual	Framework/MRV/data/docs learning from a live farm	Adelphi generates reusable learning artifacts	Evidence of reuse/adaptation by additional farms
Cultural	Documented founders’ relationship to family land/place	Place/founder narrative is documented	Broader community cultural-preservation evidence
Health	Food production + farm/work context	Food and safety-related activities can be documented	Food-access, nutrition, worker-health, medical outcomes where claimed

“All eight forms are represented” is not the same as “all eight forms improved.” Presence, activity, measured outcome, and impact interpretation are different evidence levels.

How different readers should use the 8 Forms

Farm operators

Identify which forms the farm depends on and which trade-offs need to be managed during real operations.

Impact & research reviewers

Match each capital claim to its own method, evidence quality, reporting period, uncertainty, and appropriate conclusion.

Capital governance participants

Look beyond the budget while keeping treasury authorization separate from impact validation and local farm authority.

Guilds & contributors

Identify missing work across data, agronomy, training, infrastructure, research, documentation, community, and review.

Partners & grant reviewers

See which forms are targeted, which are evidenced, where trade-offs exist, and what remains an assumption.

Developers & agents

Treat the forms as classification metadata; do not infer a universal score or convert one form into another without an explicit methodology.

Common failure modes

Failure mode	Better practice
“The farm created value across all eight forms.”	State which forms have alignment, activity, measured outcomes, or interpreted impact
“Natural Capital increased because syntropic practices were used.”	Measure the defined ecological outcome
“The training built Human Capital.”	Separate training activity from demonstrated learning/capability
“More events mean stronger Social Capital.”	Evaluate relationship quality, continuity, participation, trust, and distribution
“Infrastructure completion equals Material Capital impact.”	Track condition, utilization, maintenance, and output linkage
“Open-source publication means Intellectual Capital was created.”	Track review, use, reuse, adaptation, and improvement
“Founder history proves Cultural Capital increased.”	Preserve the story; make broader cultural claims only with broader local evidence
“Regenerative food improves health.”	Document food production/access; use appropriate health methodology for health outcomes
“All forms can be summed into one score.”	Keep unlike values distinct unless a transparent, fit-for-purpose methodology explicitly defines aggregation
“EAS verifies the capital claim.”	EAS can support provenance; evidence and methodology support the claim
“A DAO can vote that a capital outcome exists.”	Governance can authorize action/funding; it cannot make unsupported evidence true

Relationship to public goods

Public goods can appear in several forms. Examples:

Public-good activity	Possible forms
Open-source farm-data tooling	Intellectual + Social
Public training materials	Human + Intellectual
Community training	Human + Social
Native-species propagation/distribution	Natural + Social + potentially Cultural
Public evidence infrastructure	Intellectual + Social
Shared community facility	Material + Social
Place-based story archive	Cultural + Intellectual

But the public-good claim still needs:

access conditions;
beneficiary/use evidence;
funding;
delivery;
maintenance;
limitations.

A public-goods allocation percentage is Financial Capital. The public good itself may belong primarily to another form.

Current maturity

Surface	Status	Interpretation
8 Forms of Capital	Active Framework methodology	Shared value-classification vocabulary
Pillars relationship	Active	Pillars ask the questions; Forms categorize the value
MRV relationship	Active and evolving	Evidence must be appropriate to the specific claim/form
Adelphi mapping	Reference implementation	All eight forms can be discussed; outcome maturity varies by form
Cross-form aggregation	Not a default Framework method	Do not create one total score without an explicit methodology
Cross-farm comparison	Developing	Requires consistent claim semantics, periods, boundaries, and evidence
Automated capital classification	Decision support / developing	Software/agents may classify/draft; review remains necessary
Capital tokenization / pricing	Not implied by this framework	Classification does not create ownership, price, or a tradable asset

Continue through the Framework

Pillars of Value

Structure WHAT, WHO, HOW MUCH, CONTRIBUTION, RISK, and PUBLIC GOODS before classifying the value.

Positive Impact Methodology

Separate alignment, activity, measured outcome, and impact interpretation for every capital claim.

5 Principles of Regeneration

See the regenerative design practices that can create testable value hypotheses.

MRV Methodology

Connect capital claims to the source records and evidence lifecycle that support them.

Ecological Impact Frameworks

See how EBF and CRISP can interpret ecological and risk evidence without replacing the underlying records.

Adelphi Overview

Review the first live reference farm and distinguish physical assets, activities, forecasts, actuals, and evidence maturity.

The 8 Forms are useful when they stop one kind of value from hiding another — while still respecting that ecological condition, money, relationships, skills, infrastructure, knowledge, culture, and health each require their own evidence and their own limits.

​The 8 Forms of Capital help Kokonut see value without pretending every kind of value is the same.

Start with the Pillars of Value

Connect value to evidence

Interpret positive impact carefully

See Adelphi as a reference

​The eight forms in one view

​What the 8 Forms do — and what they do not

​Where the 8 Forms sit in the Framework

​Capital is a useful metaphor — not permission to financialize everything

​The eight forms

​1. Natural Capital

​What it organizes

​Useful planning questions

​Evidence can include

​Important boundary

​Adelphi reference

​2. Financial Capital

​What it organizes

​Separate financial states

​Evidence can include

​Adelphi reference

​3. Social Capital

​What it organizes

​Evidence can include

​Attendance is not the same as social capital

​Adelphi reference

​4. Human Capital

​What it organizes

​Activity is not capability

​Evidence can include

​Adelphi reference

​5. Material Capital

​What it organizes

​Existence is not performance

​Evidence can include

​Adelphi reference

​6. Intellectual Capital

​What it organizes

​Publication is not the same as reuse

​Adelphi reference

​7. Cultural Capital

​What it organizes

​Cultural value should not be invented from outside

​Evidence can include

​Adelphi reference

​8. Health Capital

​What it organizes

​Separate food production from health outcome

​Adelphi reference

​Forms can overlap without being double-counted

​Trade-offs matter

​Measurement should match the form

​Evidence maturity applies to every form

​How value becomes evidence

​A reusable capital-claim record

​Adelphi: eight forms with evidence boundaries

​How different readers should use the 8 Forms

Farm operators

Impact & research reviewers

Capital governance participants

Guilds & contributors

Partners & grant reviewers

Developers & agents

​Common failure modes

​Relationship to public goods

​Current maturity

​Continue through the Framework

Pillars of Value

Positive Impact Methodology

5 Principles of Regeneration

MRV Methodology

Ecological Impact Frameworks

Adelphi Overview

The 8 Forms of Capital help Kokonut see value without pretending every kind of value is the same.

The eight forms in one view

What the 8 Forms do — and what they do not

Where the 8 Forms sit in the Framework

Capital is a useful metaphor — not permission to financialize everything

The eight forms

1. Natural Capital

What it organizes

Useful planning questions

Evidence can include

Important boundary

Adelphi reference

2. Financial Capital

What it organizes

Separate financial states

Evidence can include

Adelphi reference

3. Social Capital

What it organizes

Evidence can include

Attendance is not the same as social capital

Adelphi reference

4. Human Capital

What it organizes

Activity is not capability

Evidence can include

Adelphi reference

5. Material Capital

What it organizes

Existence is not performance

Evidence can include

Adelphi reference

6. Intellectual Capital

What it organizes

Publication is not the same as reuse

Adelphi reference

7. Cultural Capital

What it organizes

Cultural value should not be invented from outside

Evidence can include

Adelphi reference

8. Health Capital

What it organizes

Separate food production from health outcome

Adelphi reference

Forms can overlap without being double-counted

Trade-offs matter

Measurement should match the form

Evidence maturity applies to every form

How value becomes evidence

A reusable capital-claim record

Adelphi: eight forms with evidence boundaries

How different readers should use the 8 Forms

Common failure modes

Relationship to public goods

Current maturity

Continue through the Framework