Skip to main content

This page is a forecast model — not a record of achieved harvests or revenue.

Adelphi’s crop model estimates how short-, medium-, long-cycle, and continuous production could perform under a defined set of assumptions. It is useful for:
  • planting and production planning;
  • comparing crop timelines;
  • estimating gross-revenue scenarios;
  • testing loss and price assumptions;
  • planning data collection;
  • comparing forecasts with actual harvest records over time.
It is not a live farm ledger, profit-and-loss statement, guaranteed return, or record of realized revenue.

Compare with published farm records

Use the Kokonut Hub for current published harvest, MRV, milestone, and farm records.

Understand the evidence standard

See why a forecast remains a model until actual farm records are collected, reviewed, and published.
Forecast ≠ actual. Gross revenue ≠ profit. This model does not include the full cost structure for labor, water, inputs, packaging, transport, certification, maintenance, taxes, losses after harvest, or other operating expenses.

How to read this model

The forecast combines crops that operate on different timelines. That means the headline annual total is best understood as a steady-state planning snapshot, not a guaranteed single-calendar-year result.
Coconut revenue should not be added to an early-year cash-flow expectation before the trees reach productive maturity. Likewise, passion-fruit and poultry performance should be reconciled against establishment and production records rather than assumed from the model.

Current documented assumptions

These are the assumptions currently encoded in the Adelphi forecast documentation.
The model should become less assumption-heavy over time. Every harvest, sale, loss, and operating record can replace a planning value with a farm-specific actual.

Documentation inconsistency: public-goods allocation

The repository currently contains two conflicting Adelphi allocation models.

Farm / Framework documentation

The current:
  • Common Data Schema;
  • 8 Forms of Capital page;
  • Adelphi SDG page;
  • Adelphi forecast page
model 10% of gross farm revenue for public goods once revenue is realized.

Regenerative Finance Playbook

Some ReFi Playbook pages describe a different Adelphi-specific split:
  • 40% to the Hernández family as farm operators;
  • 40% to a public-goods fund;
  • 20% to Kokonut Network.
These two models are not equivalent. Until the repository is reconciled against the approved economic arrangement, this page uses 10% only as the current farm-model assumption. It should not be presented as a legally binding, governance-approved, or already-realized distribution.
The strongest future source of truth should be the approved farm economic agreement or governance record, with the documentation updated to match it.

Forecast summary

The $149,110.87 figure is a combined gross-revenue planning snapshot using the assumptions above. It is not net income, EBITDA, distributable cash, or a guaranteed annual result.

Core calculation logic

The crop model starts from a simple production relationship:
For packaging-based crops such as passion fruit, an additional packaging step is required.
The 15% loss rate is a model-wide planning assumption. It should eventually be replaced by crop- and season-specific actual loss rates.

Short cycle — lettuce

Lettuce is the largest modeled gross-revenue stream in the current forecast.

Current variables

Production calculation

Revenue calculation

What is still an assumption

The repository currently describes:
  • 30–45 days for loose-leaf lettuce;
  • 60–75 days for head lettuce;
  • 5 modeled harvests per year.
Those timing values belong to the current planning model and should be replaced or refined with Adelphi-specific crop-cycle actuals as records accumulate.

What actuals should replace

  • planted units;
  • germination / establishment loss;
  • field loss;
  • harvest quantity;
  • quality grade;
  • rejected units;
  • donated or consumed units;
  • sold units;
  • sale price;
  • buyer/channel;
  • harvest date;
  • days from planting to harvest.

Lettuce sensitivity

The baseline forecast is highly sensitive to both losses and price.

Loss-rate sensitivity at $0.55/unit

Price sensitivity at the 15% loss baseline

These sensitivity tables are derived directly from the existing Adelphi model assumptions. They are scenarios, not new price or yield forecasts.

Medium cycle — passion fruit

Current variables

Production calculation

The existing forecast monetizes only complete nets. It does not assign revenue to the seven-fruit remainder, nor does it model packaging cost, damaged fruit, direct-sale pricing, or different buyer channels.

Actuals needed

  • surviving vines;
  • establishment date;
  • fruit count per vine;
  • harvest periods;
  • grade/rejection rate;
  • package size;
  • packaging loss;
  • realized sale price;
  • buyer/channel;
  • unsold or donated fruit.

Long cycle — coconut

Coconut is the long-duration crop in the current planning model.

Current variables

Production calculation

This is a maturity-stage annual model. It should not be treated as year-one or near-term revenue. The 3–5 year first-harvest window and 75-coconut gross-yield assumption are current planning assumptions in the repository and should be reconciled against actual Adelphi tree records over time.
Potential derivative products—oil, milk, water, husk, fiber, or timber—are not included in the baseline revenue total. If those become real commercial streams, they should have separate:
  • processing assumptions;
  • yield conversions;
  • costs;
  • prices;
  • market evidence;
  • actual sales records.

Continuous production — poultry

Adelphi documents 110 free-range laying hens. The current model estimates:
The output figure remains a planning estimate until reconciled against poultry production records. A complete poultry revenue model would need:
  • laying rate by period;
  • flock size changes;
  • mortality;
  • feed and forage inputs;
  • egg loss/breakage;
  • eggs consumed or donated;
  • eggs sold;
  • packaging;
  • sale price;
  • buyer/channel;
  • poultry operating costs.
Read the physical poultry and nutrient system →

Combined gross-revenue model

Using the current crop assumptions:
This number should be described as modeled gross crop revenue. It should not be called:
  • net revenue;
  • profit;
  • cash available for distribution;
  • household income;
  • DAO income;
  • guaranteed annual revenue.
Those require additional accounting data.

Public-goods scenario under the 10% farm assumption

If the current 10% gross-revenue allocation assumption is applied to the full modeled crop total:
Possible public-good uses documented elsewhere in the farm model include:
  • workshops;
  • education;
  • nursery operations;
  • seedling distribution;
  • community programming.
$134,199.78 is not “net operating revenue.” It is only the modeled gross crop revenue remaining after subtracting the 10% scenario allocation. No cost model has been applied.
And because the repository contains the separate 40/40/20 ReFi Playbook model described earlier, no allocation should be presented as final until the authoritative economic arrangement is reconciled.

Forecast → actual → revised forecast

The model should behave as a learning system. For each cycle, the farm should be able to calculate:
The exact denominator for loss rate should be defined consistently by crop so different periods remain comparable.

Minimum actuals dataset

To make this forecast genuinely operational, each harvest should preserve enough information to answer:

Risk and uncertainty register


What this forecast can support today

Production planning

The model defines the crop counts, cycle assumptions, loss rate, and expected output used for planning.

Scenario analysis

Assumptions can be changed to understand how loss, price, harvest frequency, and maturity affect modeled outcomes.

MRV design

The forecast identifies which actual records must be collected to test each assumption.

Variance learning

Forecast-vs-actual comparison can make future farm planning increasingly farm-specific.

What it does not support yet

  • guaranteed annual revenue;
  • farm profitability;
  • operator income;
  • distributable DAO revenue;
  • proven public-goods funding;
  • realized household economic impact;
  • verified food-security impact;
  • mature coconut revenue before maturity;
  • poultry revenue without a pricing and sales model.

Sources of truth by question


Continue through Adelphi

Compare with live farm data

Use published farm records to replace planning assumptions with actual performance where available.

Crops, Biodiversity & Infrastructure

See the physical systems behind the production assumptions.

MRV — Evidence Standard

Understand how harvest and sales records should move from observations into reviewed evidence.

Sustainable Development Goals

See which economic and food-production SDG claims remain forecasts and which require actual records.

Adelphi Overview

Return to the canonical farm overview and documented state.

Open Collaboration

Help improve forecast assumptions, crop economics, record quality, variance analysis, or farm-data tooling.
A good forecast is not one that stays correct forever. It is one that becomes more accurate because reality is allowed to update it.